…unless you count worrying about tomorrow.
100 down, many hundreds to go |
“At mile 125.9 you pass under the high-level Wilkerson Bridge, which has a 64-foot fixed vertical clearance, a foot less than the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ authorized vertical clearance at mean high water. Sailors with masts over 60 feet should know the exact their exact height mast with antennas and exercise extreme caution when passing under the bridge. The slight tidal range here may or may not provide the extra clearance required for safe passage. In April 2008 the tide boards were missing from this bridge so check locally for information. Hurricane Isabel in 2003 indicated that the water had risen to the 60-foot vertical clearance line on the tide boards on the Wilkerson Bridge; use caution in the area.”
Our mast height is 64 feet—we thought, we’d heard our broker
mention. Why don’t we know that? Probably because we believed that all the ICW
bridges were at the required 65 feet and we knew we’d pass under those without
a problem. Now, we might have a
problem. Hmmm, was that 64 feet to the
top of the mast, to the top of the anchor light, or to the top of the
antenna? Snapping off our VHF antenna
would be bad. Breaking our anchor light
would be bad. Dismasting our boat would
put a quick and terrifying end to our adventure, not to mention the risk to our
personal safety and to that of the cats should the mast and rigging come
crashing back onto the cabin and cockpit.
Options.
·
Contact the bridge tender for information. Oops, fixed bridge; no tender.
·
Contact the Coast Guard to see if they had
current information on the water level at the bridge. But what if they told us it was 62 or 63
feet? What then? Maybe our mast was short enough to go through
anyway.
·
Contact a marina near the bridge to see if they
had updated information about the tide boards and knew what time high and low
tide was for the area.
·
Call Joy’s previous owners. They would surely know. It was, according to Tommy, our broker (and
now friend, as well), they who had cut the mast down to 64 feet in order to be
ICW friendly. Good, but we would incur
roaming charges. Moot, because we didn’t
have their number with us.
·
Email them.
Same deal with regard to roaming charges and no guarantee they’d see the
email or respond right away. We’d be
stuck where were we until we heard from them.
Additionally, it would only solve the problem if the mast height was
below the lowest possible height of the bridge, which we couldn’t know ahead of
time..
·
Go back up to the nearest inlet to the Atlantic
and cruise down to the coast to south of the damn bridge. That would be backtracking. Unacceptable.
·
Just go for it and hope for the best. We only considered it for a minute.
Anchored off Tuckahoe Point (ICW Mile 104) |
No comments:
Post a Comment